Sports — and especially youth sports and children's activity — is one of the last large sectors still substantially operating on 2019 playbooks. Email-and-spreadsheet ops. Front-desk staff catching inbound during coaching hours. Founder-driven content posted whenever there's a window. Marketing built bespoke per business, agency-by-agency, with nothing that compounds across a portfolio.
None of that is wrong. It's how the sector got here. But it's also why the next two years are going to feel discontinuous.
The businesses that move first on AI aren't winning by automating away their humans. They're winning by doing the same operational work with a fraction of the drag — capturing every inbound, qualifying leads in seconds, producing content at the volume their audiences actually want, and freeing their best people to do the high-judgement work only humans can do.
The advantage doesn't show up all at once. It compounds — quietly, then loudly — across every quarter the laggards delay.
That's the thesis. The harder problem is how to act on it without falling into the two traps that catch most teams: pilot purgatory (six months of demos and proofs-of-concept that never reach production), and vendor theatre (paying for AI features that look impressive in a sales call and disappear by month three).
What I do, and what this page lays out, is a method for getting past both. Diagnose where AI moves the needle for your specific business. Architect a sequence that ships something real in weeks, not quarters. Build the deployments alongside your team — so they actually own them at the end. Then keep compounding.
The work is sector-specific because generic AI advice is everywhere and worth nothing. What's worth something is knowing where the bodies are buried in a youth sports ops stack, how a vertical SaaS founder's roadmap actually gets unblocked, where a PE-backed services business loses margin to operational drag, and what AI actually does about each of those. That's the work.